Non-Material Damages under the GDPR

Since C-300/21 Österreichische Post, the first ECJ decision on non-material damages under GDPR, the ECJ has handed down multiple other decisions on the topic (C-340/21 Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, C-667/21 Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, C-456/22 Gemeinde Ummendorf and C‑687/21 MediaMarktSaturn). There seems to be a marked effort by the Court to create a reliable jurisprudence for non-material damages. In fact, all the decisions have been assigned to and decided by the Third Chamber under Article 60 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.

This webinar by Sophia Hassel will analyse the subsequent cases after Österreichische Post to flesh out the Court’s conception of non-material damages under Article 82 GDPR and to analyse whether a coherent approach emerges from the case law.



Jurisprudentie

Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 25 januari 2024., ECLI:EU:C:2024:72
Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 14 december 2023., ECLI:EU:C:2023:988
Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 21 december 2023., ECLI:EU:C:2023:1022
Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 14 december 2023., ECLI:EU:C:2023:986
Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 4 mei 2023., ECLI:EU:C:2023:370